Advanced
Effect of [Al(DMSO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>3+</sup> Concentration on Al Electrodeposition from AlCl<sub>3</sub>/Dimethylsulfone Baths
Effect of [Al(DMSO2)3]3+ Concentration on Al Electrodeposition from AlCl3/Dimethylsulfone Baths
Journal of Electrochemical Science and Technology. 2018. Mar, 9(1): 69-77
Copyright © 2018, The Korean Electrochemical Society
  • Received : December 27, 2017
  • Accepted : March 07, 2018
  • Published : March 31, 2018
Download
PDF
e-PUB
PubReader
PPT
Export by style
Article
Author
Metrics
Cited by
About the Authors
Sangjae Kim
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
sangjai88@gmail.com
Naoya Matsunaga
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
Kensuke Kuroda
Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, IMaSS, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
Masazumi Okido
Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, IMaSS, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Abstract
Aluminum electrodeposition was carried out in dimethylsulfone (DMSO 2 ) baths containing 6.2-28.3 mol% AlCl 3 at 403 K. The electrochemically active species for Al electrodeposition in DMSO 2 baths were investigated. Electrochemical behavior of the electrolyte and the deposition mechanism were studied via cyclic voltammetry (CV). Properties of the deposits were assessed by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. In addition, structures of the ionic complexes formed with aluminum in the bath were characterized by 27 Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. NMR spectra revealed that all baths contained two ionic species: AlCl 4 - and [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ . Al electrodeposited when the [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ concentration was the highest (23.3 mol% AlCl 3 ) exhibited fine grain sizes, relatively smooth surfaces, and high purities.
Keywords
1. Introduction
Aluminum is used in many applications including structural, anti-corrosive, electronic, and optical materials. Its widespread use is due to its excellent properties, which include electrical conductivity, heat/light reflectivity, high thermal conductivity, and corrosion resistance. These properties can also be imparted to other substrates when aluminum films form on their surfaces. Smelting of Al has been industrialized by the Hall-Héroult process: Al is electrowon from alumina-dissolved cryolite molten salt at 1273 K [1] . As its low redox potential (−1.68 V vs . SHE) does not permit its electrowinning in aqueous solutions, recent attempts to fabricate Al films have employed mechanical and chemical methods such as hot dipping [2] , vapor phase deposition [3 , 4] , thermal spraying [5 , 6] , and electrodeposition [7 - 9] . Of these methods, the electrodeposition of Al boasts many advantages, including the ability to coat complex shapes evenly, relatively high deposition rates, and easily controlled coating thickness. Unlike many conventional metallic coatings, those consisting of Al films cannot be electrodeposited from aqueous solutions [10] . However, Al-coating has been achieved using non-aqueous media such as organic solvents, molten salts, and ionic liquids [11 - 19] . Of these options, the organic solvent dimethylsulfone (DMSO 2 , (CH 3 ) 2 SO 2 ) is advantageous, as it is inexpensive compared to ionic liquids and more stable than ethers and aromatic hydrocarbons [20 - 28] .
Raman analyses [26] and 27 Al NMR [29] of the AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 mixtures indicate that two main soluble Al complex ions, namely AlCl 4 and [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ , formed according to the following reaction:
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Electrodeposition of Al can occur from the solvated cation [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ , whereas the reduction of AlCl 4 - is not observed within the electrochemical window of the electrolytes. It has been demonstrated that dense, uniform Al coatings with a high corrosion resistance can be electrodeposited from AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 baths at 383 K [30 - 32] .
In this study, we investigated the electrochemical behavior of Al using DMSO 2 as a solvent. The mechanism of Al electrodeposition was also determined by NMR spectroscopy. The effect of changing [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ concentration on Al electrodeposition was also investigated. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to examine the deposition process. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were performed to determine the morphology and phase composition of the Al films, respectively.
2. Experimental
- 2.1 Electrode preparation
Al, Cu, and Pt plates and Pt coil were used as electrodes. The Al and Cu plates were wet-polished with 400 emery paper. The Pt plate and coil were immersed in hydrochloric acid to clean their surfaces and then washed with distilled water. Electrodes washed with acetone for 20 min before being used for CV. Cu and Pt plates were coated with Nitoflon insulating tape to form a working electrode with an area of 1 cm 2 .
- 2.2 Bath preparation
DMSO 2 (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Japan, 99 mass%) and anhydrous aluminum chloride grains (AlCl 3 , Nacalai Tesque, crystallized, 98 mass%) were used as the solvent and Al source, respectively. The amount of DMSO 2 used in each experiment corresponded to 0.74 mole. DMSO 2 was pretreated to remove water by holding the powder at 333 K for at least 48 h in a vacuum. To prepare the experimental baths, DMSO 2 powder was heated in a 100-cm 3 glass beaker at 403 K. AlCl 3 powder was then carefully added to the melted DMSO 2 . Bath preparation was conducted in an Ar-filled glovebox.
- 2.3 Electrochemical measurements and characterization of deposits
Electrochemical properties were measured in the Ar-filled glovebox with a potentiostat/galvanostat (BioLogic, SP 150). Cyclic voltammograms were between −2 V and 2 V vs . Al/Al 3+ at a scan rate of 100 mVs -1 . Galvanostatic electrodeposition was performed at a current density of 40 mAcm -2 . The temperature was maintained at 403 K using a hotplate. Cu (Nilaco, >99% purity) and Al (Nilaco, >99.99% purity) plates were used as the working and counter electrodes, respectively. An Al rod was immersed in the bath as the reference electrode (Al/Al 3+ ). A portion of the copper plate was masked with insulating tape, leaving an exposed surface area of 1.0 cm 2 . The electrolyte was agitated at 150 rpm during the experiment using a magnetic stirring device at the bottom of the beaker.
- 2.4 Bath characterization
Spectra for Al 3+ complexes in AlCl 3 –DMSO 2 solution were recorded using UV-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis spectrophotometer, JASCO model V-650, Japan). Absorbance measurements were performed with a quartz cell with a path length of 1 cm. The amount of DMSO 2 was fixed at 0.74 mole, while the concentration of AlCl 3 varied from 6.2 to 28.3 mol% AlCl 3 at 403 K. The absorbance of each solution was measured at 255 and 600 nm.
In this study, the mol% of AlCl 3 was calculated using Eq. (2):
PPT Slide
Lager Image
27 Al NMR spectroscopy was performed at 130.3 MHz using a 500 MHz NMR spectrometer (Agilent Technology). All chemical shifts were referenced to D 2 O containing 1.5 M Al(NO 3 ) 3 , which was used as an external reference. Samples were placed in 10 mm NMR tubes with a 5-mm coaxial tube filled with DMSO- d 6 as a lock solvent. Spectra were gathered at 403 K, as in the electrochemical measurements.
Ru K-edge XAFS was measured in the transmission mode at 20 K at the NW10A station with a Si(311) double-crystal monochromator. The energy and current of electrons in the storage ring were 6.5 GeV and 60 mA, respectively. Ionization chambers filled with pure Ar and pure Kr were used to monitor the incident and transmitted X-rays, respectively.
- 2.5 Characterization of electrodeposits
After electrolysis, deposits were washed with a AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 solution and vacuum-dried prior to characterization. Crystal orientation and surface morphology of the deposits were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku Ultima IV; 40 kV, −30 mA, 0.4° min -1 ) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; NeoScope JCM-5000, JEOL). Chemical characterization and elemental analysis for Al, S, and Cl was performed using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX; EDAX Genesis 2000). In addition, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Shimadzu, ESCA-3300) was carried out to examine the chemical composition. XPS was performed using a Mg-Kα X-ray source with an Ar + etching rate of approximately 0.5 nm/min, which was determined using SiO 2 as a standard film. The XPS spectra were calibrated relative to the C 1s peak at 285.0 eV.
3. Results and Discussion
- 3.1 Cyclic voltammetry with different concentration ratios of AlCl3/DMSO2
Cyclic voltammetry was carried out from −2 to 2 V at a rate of 100 mVs -1 in a DMSO 2 bath containing 6.2−28.3 mol% AlCl 3 at 403 K. The electrode potential was scanned from the open-circuit potential near 0 V in the negative direction, followed by scanning in the positive direction and then cycling. As shown in Eq. 3-5, AlCl 3 dissociates in DMSO 2 to produce Al 3+ and Al 3+ and DMSO 2 and form the ionic complex [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ . Sweeping in the cathodic direction causes metallic Al to electrodeposit from [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ . When sweeping in the anodic direction, the precipitated Al is redissolved, resulting in the formation of Al 3+ via a reversible reaction [24] . Fig. 1 shows voltammograms recorded after 20 cycles in a DMSO 2 bath. The shapes of the curves did not change after the third cycle. The rise in the cathodic current close to −0.5 V corresponds to precipitation of Al, while the increase in the anodic current indicates dissolution of Al.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Cyclic voltammograms of Pt electrode in AlCl3-DMSO2 baths at 403 K with AlCl3 concentrations : (a) 0 (pure DMSO2), (b) 6.2, (c) 11.6, (d) 23.3, and (e) 28.3 mol%.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The reduction potential for Al electroplating varied with the concentration of [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ . Current density depends on the Al ion contents. Thus, this potential was used as a reference.
UV-visible spectrophotometry was performed to further investigate the reversible reaction. The absorption spectra of various concentrations of AlCl 3 in DMSO 2 are shown in Fig. 2 . DMSO 2 exhibits a strong absorption band at 392 nm. Spectra following the addition of Al 3+ to the solution show a decrease in the absorption peak at 392 nm, while a band centered at 456 nm increases with up to 23.3 mol% AlCl 3 . For concentrations of AlCl 3 greater than 6.2 mol%, a second isosbestic point is observed at 470 nm, accompanied by the increase in a new band at 475 nm, which is characteristic of the formation of a complex ion. As all spectra cross at least one of the two isosbestic points, the simultaneous presence of the free ion and the two main complex ions is not observed. This indicates that Al 3+ is cleanly converted into the [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ complex. Our results are in agreement with the data presented by Cornard et al. for quercetin [33] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
UV-visible spectra of DMSO2-Al(III) complexes with various AlCl3 concentrations at 403 K: (a) 0 (pure DMSO2), (b) 6.2, (c) 11.6, (d) 23.3, and (e) 28.3 mol%.
Fig. 1 also shows that the reduction potential of Al 3+ in ionic liquids decreases in the order 23.3 mol% AlCl 3 > 28.3 mol% AlCl 3 > 11.6 mol% AlCl 3 > 6.2 mol% AlCl 3 . Similar negative shifts have been observed when Al/Al 3+ was directly immersed in baths [34] .
Our observations for the effect of the mole percent of AlCl 3 /DMSO 2 are similar to data presented by Jiang et al. [24] . They reported that electrolytes with AlCl 3 /DMSO 2 ratios of 0.2:1 and 0.3:1 have wider ranges of operating current densities. To confirm the operating range of the current density, experiments were performed from 20 mAcm -2 to 80 mAcm -2 at 403 K. The results are shown in Table 1 . In terms of current efficiency, a current density of 20 mAcm -2 was the best, but resulted in a black surface on electrodeposited Al surface. Thus, we selected a current density of 40 mAcm -2 , which provided a clean film with a high current efficiency. However, further investigation was needed to determine the cause of the wider operating current density. To that end, the influence of the AlCl 3 concentration on the ion species in the bath and the electrodeposition of Al was examined using NMR.
Properties of the current density of DMSO2baths containing 23.3 mol% AlCl3.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Properties of the current density of DMSO2 baths containing 23.3 mol% AlCl3.
- 3.2 NMR measurements using various AlCl3/DMSO2mixture
Cyclic voltammetry measurements indicated that the composition of ions in the AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 mixture changed with AlCl 3 concentration. Thus, the relationship between the concentration of AlCl 3 and the ionic species observed in the bath and on the electrodeposition of Al was investigated by NMR spectroscopy. 27 Al NMR spectroscopy was used, as this technique allows the environment of Al atoms to be unambiguously determined in most cases. As previously reported, octahedral Al is found at chemical shifts of around 0 ppm in the 27 Al NMR spectra, while tetrahedral Al is found around 100 ppm [35 - 37] .
27 Al NMR spectra obtained for the four mixtures are shown in Fig. 3 . The results showed that AlCl 4 - and [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ species were formed in DMSO 2 baths containing 6.2-28.3 mol% AlCl 3 . The sulfone-solvated Al 3+ species is generated along with the formation of AlCl 4 - [29] . Since the source of Cl - is AlCl 3 , asymmetric cleavage of AlCl 3 forms AlCl 4 and [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ . We confirmed the structure of the complex ion by conducting XAFS analysis of the AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 bath in more detail. Fig. 4 shows the K-edge XAFS analysis for S in DMSO 2 and in the AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 bath. For only DMSO 2 , the peak at 2479 eV is larger in the AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 mixture compared to what is observed for DMSO 2 alone. This is because the O of DMSO 2 is coordinated to Al 3+ , the electrons of O are attracted to Al 3+ , and the electrons of S are attracted to O. Therefore, O is thought to have caused some new bonding with AlCl 3 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
27Al NMR spectra of AlCl3-DMSO2 baths containing AlCl3 concentrations: (a) 6.2, (b) 11.6, (c) 23.3, and (d) 28.3 mol%.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
K-edge XAFS analysis of S in AlCl3-DMSO2 bath.
Fig. 5 shows the results of K-edge XAFS analysis of Cl in an AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 bath and in AlCl 3 alone. Peaks at 2824 eV and 2830 eV were observed for AlCl 3 alone, whereas in the AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 bath, one large peak at 2826 eV was observed. We suggest that the large peak at 2826 eV obscures those at 2824 and 2830 eV, giving rise to a single large peak for the mixture. The peak energy value depends on bond length rather than atom to which Cl is bonded. Therefore, Cl of AlCl 3 is unlikely to form a direct bond with DMSO 2 , and it is thought that Al, which forms a new bond with DMSO 2 , forms a complex ion [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
K-edge XAFS analysis of Cl in AlCl3-DMSO2 bath.
27 Al NMR of AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 confirmed the presence of AlCl 4 - (110 ppm) and [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ (−10 ppm) at 403 K. These chemical shifts were assigned based on the work of Legrand et al. [29] . AlCl 4 - is electrochemically inactive, while Al 2 Cl 7 - is active in the case of room-temperature ionic liquids. Since the anionic species in the DMSO 2 baths containing 6.2−28.3 mol% AlCl 3 are AlCl 4 - , we conclude that [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ is electrochemically active. The peak for [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ intensified as the concentration of AlCl 3 increased.
Fig. 6 shows the calculated concentrations of each ion species in 6.2−28.3 mol% AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 baths, as determined from NMR spectra. As the concentration of AlCl 3 increased, the observed concentration of [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ also increased. However, in the 28.3 mol% AlCl 3 bath, the calculated concentration decreased slightly (a smaller peak was observed). To calculate the absolute amounts of [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ present in each bath, the molar amount of AlCl 3 was multiplied by the calculated [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ concentration ratio ( Fig. 7 ). The absolute amount of [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ was calculated using Eq. (7).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Concentrations of ion species in DMSO2 baths with various AlCl3 concentrations: (a) 6.2, (b) 11.6, (c) 23.3, and (d) 28.3 mol% as measured by 27Al NMR.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Concentration of [Al(DMSO2)3]3+ as a function of the AlCl3 concentration in AlCl3/DMSO2 baths.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
The concentration of [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ increased with additional AlCl 3 ; however, it remained almost unchanged when the amount of AlCl 3 was increased from 23.3 to 28.3 mol%, indicating that almost no additional [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ forms in baths with AlCl 3 concentrations of greater than 23.3 mol%. When combined with the observation that AlCl 4 concentration increases with larger amounts of AlCl 3 , this finding indicates that the decrease in the current observed in the bath containing 28.3 mol% AlCl 3 results from a lower [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ concentration that leads to reduced Al electrodeposition. Furthermore, increased viscosity of the bath may compromise the deposition. The results show that an AlCl 3 concentration of approximately 23.3 mol% is optimal for the electrodeposition of Al from AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 baths.
- 3.3 Influence of AlCl3concentration on the plated film
Galvanostatic electrodepositions were carried out to confirm the properties of the deposited Al and the effect of the concentration of AlCl 3 in the DMSO 2 baths. Fig. 8 shows photographs of the Al deposits obtained from AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 baths held at a constant current density of 40 mAcm -2 for 60 min at 403 K. Cu and Al plates were used as the cathode and anode, respectively. As shown, grayish-white Al plating was observed with high concentrations of AlCl 3 (23.3 and 28.3 mol%).
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Surface photographs of Al films electrodeposited on Cu substrates at 40 mAcm-2 for 1 h in AlCl3/DMSO2 baths at 403 K with AlCl3 concentrations: (a) 6.2, (b) 11.6, (c) 23.3, and (d) 28.3 mol%.
XRD measurements shown in Fig. 9 confirmed that the deposits consisted of crystalline Al metal without trace impurities such as Al 2 O 3 . The height of the Cu substrate peak was considered to be constant for normalization purposes (Cu (200) peak at 51°). In each pattern, diffraction peaks relating to Al (111), (200), (220), and (311) were observed. The Al (200) reflection was notably higher than the Al (111) reflection, indicating Al (200) as the preferential orientation under the experimental conditions. This result agrees with Pangarov’s theory [38] , which predicts that fcc metals electrodeposited at low overpotentials are preferentially orientated in the (111) direction and that this preference changes to (200) with increasing overpotential.
The preferential crystal orientation of Al differed among samples. Al formed in baths containing 23.3 mol% or 28.3 mol% AlCl 3 was oriented primarily in the (200) plane ( Figs. 9 (c) and (d) ), while the Al(200) peaks observed in Figs. 9 (a) and (b) are smaller. Therefore, it can be deduced that the Al layer formed using either 23.3 mol% AlCl 3 or 28.3 mol% AlCl 3 was much thicker than that formed using 6.2 mol% AlCl 3 or 11.6 mol % AlCl 3 baths.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
XRD pattern of deposit obtained on a Cu substrate galvanostatic electrodeposition in AlCl3/DMSO2 baths at 403 K with AlCl3 concentrations: (a) 6.2, (b) 11.6, (c) 23.3, and (d) 28.3 mol%.
Fig. 10 shows the effect of the AlCl 3 concentration on the microstructure of the electroplated Al surface formed over 60 min in a DMSO 2 bath containing 6.2−28.3 mol% AlCl 3 at a constant current density of 40 mAcm -2 at 403 K. Significant cracking was observed on the surfaces of the Al films made in the baths containing 6.2 mol% and 11.6 mol% AlCl 3 ( Fig. 10 (a) and (b) ). A small number of cracks can also be seen in the sample obtained using 23.3 mol% AlCl 3 , though there are regions that appear entirely crack-free when compared with those of the other specimens. Small white stains are observed, particularly when 23.3 mol% AlCl 3 was used, but overall this sample had the cleanest surface. In addition, the deposits were almost flat, and the thickness was 45 µm, in good agreement with the calculated values assuming 90% current efficiency (45 µm), indicating that the coatings were compact. The current efficiency according to the concentration of AlCl 3 is shown in Table 2 .
Properties of the DMSO2baths containing 6.2-28.3 mol% AlCl3.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Properties of the DMSO2 baths containing 6.2-28.3 mol% AlCl3.
EDX analysis for the area shown in Fig. 10 indicated that 23.3 mol% AlCl 3 shows the highest purity of Al in the experimental samples. The results are shown in Table 3 . S and Cl were detected as the main impurities. Inclusion of S and Cl is characteristic of coatings electrodeposited from AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 electrolytes [39] . Fe is detected because it is present in trace amounts in AlCl 3 .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Surface SEM image of Al film electrodeposited on Cu substrate under 40 mAcm-2 for 1 h in AlCl3/DMSO2 baths at 403 K with AlCl3 concentrations: (a) 6.2, (b) 11.6, (c) 23.3, and (d) 28.3 mol%.
Chemical composition (mass%) of Al deposited from the bath.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Chemical composition (mass%) of Al deposited from the bath.
XPS analysis was performed to further investigate the impurities. A representative set of XPS spectra of the Cl 2p, S 2p, and S 2s regions is shown in Fig. 11 . A signal was detected at ~199 eV, which compares to Cl 2p 3/2 binding energies for many chlorides. This result confirms that Cl was not a surface contaminant but rather was incorporated in the Al coating during electrodeposition. As for S, an S 2p signal was detected at ~169.3 eV from the surface of Al electrodeposition. The peak position is close to the reported value for DMSO 2 (169.2 eV) [40] , thus confirming the presence of DMSO 2 on the surface of the Al coating. If sulfides or elemental sulfur were present, signals would appear in the range of 160-165 eV [41] . This region is obscured by the Al satellite peak; thus, the S 2s region was analyzed to clarify whether S is present in other forms. In the S 2s region, a signal was observed at 233.2 eV from the surface of the Al coating. Another signal was found at a lower binding energy (about 226 eV), which is ascribed to a sulfide in the coating, consistent with what is reported in the literature [42 , 43] . XPS analysis showed no peak for Fe.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
XPS spectra of Al film electrodeposited on Cu substrate under 40 mAcm-2 for 1 h in AlCl3/DMSO2 baths at 403 K with AlCl3 concentrations: (a) 6.2, (b) 11.6, (c) 23.3, and (d) 28.3 mol%.
4. Conclusions
Al was electrodeposited from AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 baths containing 6.2−28.3 mol% AlCl 3 . CV indicated that electroplating is a reversible process, while 27 Al NMR spectroscopy confirmed that while both [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ and AlCl 4 - ions are present in the baths, only the cation produces electroplated Al. The concentration of [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ increased as more AlCl 3 was added, plateauing at an AlCl 3 concentration of 23.3 mol%. This result indicates that little additional [Al(DMSO 2 ) 3 ] 3+ formed with AlCl 3 concentrations greater than 23.3 mol%; instead, AlCl 4 formed. Thus, electroplating of Al should be performed in AlCl 3 -DMSO 2 baths with AlCl 3 concentrations of approximately 23.3 mol%.
Acknowledgements
We thank Mie Torii for her experimental help in NMR measurements.
References
Brukin A. R. 1987 Production of Aluminium and Alumina, Critical Reports in Applied Chemistry John Wiley 20
Deqing W. , Ziyuan S. , Longjiang Z. 2003 Longjiang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 214 (1-4) 304 - 311    DOI : 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00505-1
Liu Y. , Overzet L. J. , Goeckner M. J. 2006 Thin Solid Films 510 (1-2) 48 - 54    DOI : 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.156
Charrier C. , Jacquot P. , Denisse E. , Millet J. P. , Mazille H. 1997 Surf. Coat Technol. 90 (1-2) 29 - 34    DOI : 10.1016/S0257-8972(96)03080-0
Campo M. , Carboneras M. , Lopez M. D. , Torres B. , Rodrigo P. , Otero E. , Rams J. 2009 Surf. Coat Technol. 203 (20-21) 3224 - 3230    DOI : 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.03.057
Paredes R. S. C. , Amico S. C. , d'Oliveira A. S. C. M. 2006 Surf. Coat Technol. 200 (9) 3049 - 3055    DOI : 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.200
Gálová M. 1980 Surf. Technol. 11 (5) 357 - 369    DOI : 10.1016/0376-4583(80)90053-9
Zhao Y. , VanderNoot T. J. 1997 Electrochim. Acta 42 (11) 1639 - 1643    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(96)00271-X
Lehmkuhl H. , Mehler K. , Landau U. , Gerischer H , Tobias CW 1990 The Principles and Techniques of Electrolytic Aluminum Deposition and Dissolution in Organoaluminum Electrolytes Advances in Electrochemical Science and Engineering VCH Verlagsgesellschaft Weinheim 3
Simka W. , Puszczyk D. , Nawrat G. 2009 Electrochim. Acta 54 (23) 5307 - 5319    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.04.028
El Abedin S. Z. , Moustafa E. M. , Hempelmann R. , Natter H. , Endres F. 2005 Electrochem. Comm. 7 (11) 1111 - 1116    DOI : 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.08.010
Chang J. K. , Chen S. Y. , Tsai W. T. , Deng M. J. , Sun I. W. 2007 Electrochem. Comm. 9 (7) 1602 - 1606    DOI : 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.03.009
Endres F. , Abbott A. P. , MacFarlane D. R. 2008 Electrodeposition from Ionic Liquids Wiley-VCH Weinheim
Barchi L. , Bardi U. , Caporali S. , Fantini M. , Scrivani A. , Scrivani A. 2010 Prog. Org. Coat. 67 (2) 146 - 151    DOI : 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.10.017
Abbott A. P. , Qiu F. , Abood H. , Ali M. , Ryder K. 2010 Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 (8) 1862 - 1872    DOI : 10.1039/B917351J
Takahashi S. , Akimoto K. , Saeki I. 1989 J. Surf. Finish Soc. Jpn. 4 134 - 135
Abbott A. P. , Eardley C. A. , Farley N. R. S. , Griffith G. A. , Pratt A. 2001 J. Appl. Electrochem. 31 (12) 1345 - 1350    DOI : 10.1023/A:1013800721923
Liao Q. , Pitner W. R. , Stewart G. , Hussey C. L. , Stafford G. R. 1997 J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (3) 936 - 943    DOI : 10.1149/1.1837510
Hurley F. H. , Wier T. P. 1951 J. Electrochem. Soc. 98 (5) 207 - 212    DOI : 10.1149/1.2778133
Hirato T. , Fransaer J. , Celis J.-P. 2001 J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 (4) C280 - C283    DOI : 10.1149/1.1354616
Shiomi S. , Miyake M. , Hirato T. , Sato A. 2011 Mater. Trans. 52 (6) 1216 - 1221    DOI : 10.2320/matertrans.M2010421
Miyake M. , Tajikara S. , Hirato T. 2011 High Temp. Mater. Processes 30 (4-5) 485 - 489
Miyake M. , Tajikara S. , Hirato T. 2011 Surf. Coat Tech. 20 (21-22) 5141 - 5146
Jiang T. , Brym M. J. C. , Dube G. , Lasia A. , Brisard G. M. 2007 Surf. Coat Tech. 201 (14) 6309 - 6317    DOI : 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.035
Legrand L. , Tranchant A. , Messina R. 1994 J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (2) 378 - 382    DOI : 10.1149/1.2054735
Legrand L. , Tranchant A. , Messina R. , Romain F. , Lautie A. 1996 Inorg. Chem. 35 (5) 1310 - 1312    DOI : 10.1021/ic941455q
Miyake M. , Motonami H. , Hirato T. 2012 ISIJ Int. 52 (12) 2273 - 2277    DOI : 10.2355/isijinternational.52.2273
Shiomi S. , Miyake M. , Hirato T. 2012 J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 (4) D225 - D229    DOI : 10.1149/2.079204jes
Legrand L. , Heintz M. , Tranchant A. , Messina R. 1995 Electrochim. Acta 40 (11) 1711 - 1716    DOI : 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00019-B
Gaylord Chemical Company 2007 L.L.C, Dimethyl Sulfone(DMSO2) Physical Properties
Pereira-Ramos J. P. , Messina R. , Perichon J. 1986 J. Electroanal. Chem. 209 (2) 283 - 296    DOI : 10.1016/0022-0728(86)80554-X
Legrand L. , Tranchant A. , Messina R. 1996 Electrochim. Acta 41 (17) 2715 - 2720    DOI : 10.1016/0013-4686(96)00126-0
Cornard J. P. , Merlin J. C. 2002 J. Inorg. Biochem. 92 (1) 19 - 27    DOI : 10.1016/S0162-0134(02)00469-5
Endo A. , Miyake M. , Hirato T. 2014 Electrochim. Acta 137 470 - 475    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.044
Hinton J. F. , Briggs R. W. , Harris R. K. , Mann B. E. 1978 NMR and the Periodic Table Academic Press
Akitt J. W. 1972 Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc 5 465 - 556
Dechter J. J. 1982 Prog. Inorg. Chem. 29 285 - 385
Pangarov N. A. 1965 J. Electroanal. Chem. 9 (1) 70 - 85
Miyake M. , Motonami H. , Shiomi S. , Hirato T. 2012 Surf. Coat. Technol. 206 (19-20) 4225 - 4229    DOI : 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.04.027
Lindberg B. J. , Hamrin K. , Johansson G. , Gelius U. , Fahlmann A. , Nordling C. , Siegbahn K. 1970 Phys. Scr. 1 (5-6) 286 - 6    DOI : 10.1088/0031-8949/1/5-6/020
Moulder J. F. , Stickle W. F. , Sobol P. E. , Bomben K. D. 1995 Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data
Bhide V. G. , Salkalachen S. , Rastogi A. C. , Rao C. N. R. , Hegde M. S. 1981 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 14 (9) 1647 -    DOI : 10.1088/0022-3727/14/9/012
Strohmeier B. R. , Hercules D. M. 1984 J. Catal. 86 (2) 266 - 279    DOI : 10.1016/0021-9517(84)90372-5