Effect of Deposition Parameters on the Morphology and Electrochemical Behavior of Lead Dioxide
Effect of Deposition Parameters on the Morphology and Electrochemical Behavior of Lead Dioxide
Journal of Electrochemical Science and Technology. 2017. Sep, 8(3): 197-205
Copyright © 2017, The Korean Electrochemical Society
  • Received : March 28, 2017
  • Accepted : May 17, 2017
  • Published : September 30, 2017
Export by style
Cited by
About the Authors
Md Delowar Hossain
Departmentof Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
Chand Mohammad Mustafa
Departmentof Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
Md Mayeedul Islam
Department of Chemistry, Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Rajshahi 6204, Bangladesh

Lead dioxide thin films were electrodeposited on nickel substrate from acidic lead nitrate solution. Current efficiency and thickness measurements, cyclic voltammetry, AFM, SEM, and X-ray diffraction experiments were conducted on PbO 2 surface to elucidate the effect of lead nitrate concentration, current density, temperature on the morphology, chemical behavior, and crystal structure. Experimental results showed that deposition efficiency was affected by the current density and solution concentration. The film thickness was independent of current density when deposition from high Pb(NO 3 ) 2 concentration, while it decreased for low concentration and high current density deposition. On the other hand, deposition temperature had negative effect on current efficiency more for lower current density deposition. Cyclic voltammetric study revealed that comparatively more β-PbO 2 produced compact deposits when deposition was carried out from high Pb(NO 3 ) 2 concentration. Such compact films gave lower charge discharge current density during cycling. SEM and AFM studies showed that deposition of regular-size sharp-edge grains occurred for all deposition conditions. The grain size for high temperature and low concentration Pb(NO 3 ) 2 deposition was bigger than from low temperature and high concentration deposition conditions. While cycling converted all grains into loosely adhered flappy deposit with numerous pores. X-ray diffraction measurement indicates that high concentration, high temperature, and high current density favored β-PbO 2 deposition while α-PbO 2 converted to β-PbO 2 together with some unconverted PbSO 4 during cycling in H 2 SO 4 .
1. Introduction
Lead dioxide (PbO 2 ) has been extensively investigated since its first use as a positive electrode in the lead-acid battery more than 150 years ago [1] . In addition to battery applications, it is broadly used as a metal oxide anode electrode due to its well-established advantages including a low cost compared to noble metals, easy to preparation, high electrical conductivity, good chemical stability in corrosive media, relatively large surface area and high over-potential for oxygen evolution reaction [2 - 4] . Currently, lead oxide is widely utilized in several electrochemical and industrial applications such as electro-catalyst (for example, for the formation of salicylic acid, 2-naphtol) [5 , 6] , pH sensor [7] , anodic material for ozone production [8 - 10] , and oxidizing agent (for the oxidation of Cr 3+ to Cr 4+ ), and organic compounds in waste water treatments [11 - 13] . PbO 2 has also been proposed as a component of dimensionally stable anode electrodes, in order to improve their electrocatalytic activity [14] .
Traditionally lead oxide is prepared by pasted plate technology of which involves several consecutive and time-consuming processes. The alternative method involving electrodeposition of active materials directly onto the substrate offers several advantages over pasted plate technology; such as - it is faster method as lead ions can be directly oxidized to PbO 2 [15] , it can facilitate the use of light weight substrate as compared to lead alloy grid [16 , 17] , and it is easy to control thickness and morphology of films [18] . Physicochemical behaviors as well as morphology of the electrochemically deposited PbO 2 widely vary depending on the electrolyte used (conc. of Pb 2+ , pH, presence of anions and additives etc.), change of electrodeposition parameters (current density, temperature, and potential etc.), and substrate types (Pt, Au, Ti, Ni, graphite etc.) and their pretreatment conditions.
PbO 2 is known to exist in two polymorphs: orthorhombic α-PbO 2 generally deposits from basic and tetragonal β-PbO 2 deposits from acidic solutions [19] . Lead dioxide electrodeposited on the reticulated vitreous carbon from acetate solution produced mainly α-PbO 2 and that from nitrate solution produced β-PbO 2 [20] . It has been reported [21] that electrochemical deposition of PbO 2 on the Ni-substrate from electrolyte containing lead methanesulfonate and methanesulfonic acid produced compact β-phase only. The α-PbO 2 having more compact structure possesses better contact between particles than that of β-PbO 2 ; however, β-PbO 2 possesses higher catalytic activity in dilute H 2 SO 4 [22 , 23] . A report reveals that spontaneous surface modification occurred during cycling in acid media, and when a mixture of α- and β-PbO 2 was cycled in H 2 SO 4 the composition of the mixture changed with the decrease of α-PbO 2 in the outer layer [24] . In another investigation, it has been reported that PbO 2 deposited from nitrate solution had different phases of β-PbO 2 depending on whether Au or Ti was used as substrate [25] . An investigation on electrodeposition of PbO 2 on Pt, Au and Ti from solution containing Pb(NO 3 ) 2 , HClO 4 , NaF, and methanol shows that low current density deposition produced uniform crystal grains with clear crystal edge, whereas higher current density produced deposition with rice-shape surface morphology [26] .
Nickel is cheap, easily available, and has low density and sufficient strength together with good current collecting property due to high conductivity. On the other hand, Pb(NO 3 ) 2 is a cheap and easily available chemical with high aqueous solubility. Although some works have been conducted to electrodeposit PbO 2 on Ni-substrate but the effect of different deposition conditions on the electrodeposition of PbO 2 on nickel from acidic Pb(NO 3 ) 2 media is still unrevealed in extensive literature survey. In our work, we systematically investigated the effect of various deposition parameters such as Pb(NO 3 ) 2 concentration, anodic current density, and temperature on the surface morphology, crystal structure, and electrochemical behaviour of deposited PbO 2 on the Ni-surface. The deposited PbO 2 film has been characterised by deposition current efficiency and thickness measurements, and cyclic voltammetric experiments. Electrodeposition conditions greatly affect morphological and crystal structural states of the PbO 2 deposit, and these in turn affect behaviour pattern of the deposit. Therefore, due emphasis has been given to investigate these two properties. Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) have been used to investigate morphology, and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) study has been used to investigate crystal structural conditions.
2. Experimental
- 2.1. Material, chemicals, and their preparations
Commercially pure (purity 99.9%) 0.1 mm thick and 1 cm × 4 cm sized nickel coupons were used as substrate for PbO 2 electrodeposition. Nickel coupons were polished with 1200 grit SiC paper, washed with liquid soap solution and immersed for 10 minutes in aqueous 1% NaOH solution. These were then cleaned in tap water, rinsed with distilled water, and finally dried in open air. The dry coupons were carefully covered with an insulating paint leaving 1 cm 2 area exposed at one end for experiment. Small portions at both sides of the other end were also left exposed for electrical contact. These were further dried in an oven for 1 hour at 80°C. Weight of the dry coupons were accurately measured by an analytical balance, and preserved in a desiccator containing silica gel for subsequent experiment.
Lead nitrate (Qualikems, India), nitric acid (BDH, England), sodium hydroxide (E. Merck, India) and sulphuric acid (E. Merck, India) used in this work were analytical grade reagents. Aqueous 0.1 M, and 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solutions in 0.1 M HNO 3 for electrodeposition, and 4.7 M H 2 SO 4 solution for cyclic voltammetry were prepared by doubly distilled water.
- 2.2. PbO2electrodeposition on Ni-substrate
Electrodeposition of PbO 2 was carried out Galvanostatically using a precision controlled regulated DC Power Source (Model PS 303, Loadstar Electronics, Taiwan). The cell was a 100 mL Pyrex glass beaker containing 80 mL Pb(NO 3 ) 2 in HNO 3 electrolyte placed on a thermostatically controlled hot plate having magnetic stirring facility (Model MS 300, Bante Instrument Ltd., China). The prepared Ni coupon connected to the positive terminal of the power source and another clean non-insulated coupon connected to the negative terminal were placed in parallel 2 cm apart in the cell solution in such a way so that the exposed surface was well immersed in the electrolyte, and the crocodile clips for electrical contact were well above the liquid level. A multimeter having zero resistance ammeter facility (Model 7045, Solartron Digital Multimeter, England) was connected in series for measuring current. After electrodeposition for the specified period (20 minutes) the anode was carefully washed in water and rinsed with distilled water. This was dried in open air and then in an oven for one hour at 80°C, and finally weighted accurately. The amount of PbO 2 deposited was the difference of the weight of the coupon after and before electrodeposition. The deposition current efficiency and thickness were calculated using the following expressions.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where, n is no. of electron involved in the PbO 2 deposition, W is deposition weight in g, F is Faraday constant (96478 coulombs), M is molecular weight of PbO 2 in g, I is the current density in A cm -2 and t is time of deposition in second.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
where, W is the weight of the deposited PbO 2 in g, A is area of the plated surface in cm 2 and D is density of PbO 2 (9.38 g cm -3 ). The anode potential was measured by Saturated Ag|AgCl Reference Electrode (SSE) having Luggin capillary probe facility.
- 2.3. Cyclic voltammetric characterisation
Gill AC Impedance Analyser (ACM Instruments, England) was used for cyclic voltammetry. The experiment was conducted on a three-electrode glass beaker cell containing PbO 2 deposited Ni as working electrode (WE), SSE with Luggin capillary probe as a reference electrode and Pt wire gauge as a counter electrode (CE). All voltammetric experiments were conducted in 4.7 M H 2 SO 4 at 30°C temperature in static condition, and all potentials were reported against SSE. Experiments were conducted, and data collection and analyses were made with Gill AC software installed in a PC. Charge and discharge densities were calculated from the area under the peak or peak position divided by the scan rate following the procedure reported elsewhere [21] . The charge efficiency was obtained from the ratio of discharge density and charge density.
- 2.4. Morphology and crystal structure determinations
Model XEI-70 Park System Atomic Force Microscope (Suwon, Korea) and Model FEI Inspect S50 Scanning Electron Microscope (Oregon, USA) were used for the morphological and microstructural study. X-ray diffraction experiments were conducted with Model PW 3040 X’Pert PRO XRD System (Netherland) using Ni-filtered Cu-Kα radiation and “Cu-Tube” with maximum input voltage 60 KV and current 55 mA.
3. Results and Discussion
- 3.1. Current efficiency and thickness on deposition conditions
Lead dioxide (PbO 2 ) was electrodeposited on the Ni-substrate from aqueous 0.1 M and 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solutions in 0.1 M HNO 3 . The effect of applied anodic current density and temperature on the current efficiency and film thickness were measured. Thickness measurements were carried out for constant 600 coulombs of applied charge density shown in Fig. 1 . The current efficiency increased with increase of deposition current density for the deposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution, whereas it decreased for 0.1 M solution. The thickness remained almost unchanged (~46 μm) in the entire current density range for deposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution, whereas it decreased after 25 mA cm -2 current density for deposition from 0.1 M solution. Between two anodic reactions i.e., PbO 2 film formation and oxygen evolution occur according to the following equations [27] .
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Effect of current density on current efficiency and thickness for PbO2 deposition on Ni from – (■) 0.1 M and (●) 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 solutions in 0.1 M HNO3 at 30°C. Time and total charge density were 20 min. and 600 coulombs respectively.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Equation (4) is responsible for lowering of the current efficiency. The anode potential recorded with respect to SSE increased from initial 1.35 V to 2.2 V during electrodeposition from the low concentration Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution at 50 mA cm -2 currentdensity due to concentration polarization effect. That big polarization was absent for the electrodeposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution. Oxygen evolution reaction starts at around 1.8 V which is more positive than the PbO 2 formation potential [28] . Thus, low current efficiency for deposition from low concentration of Pb(NO 3 ) 2 at high current density is reasonable. The film thickness is not exactly proportional to the current density which reveals formation of more dense film of PbO 2 from low Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution.
The effect of temperature on current efficiency for deposition of PbO 2 from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution at all three current densities i.e., 10 mA cm -2 , 30 mA cm -2 and 50 mA cm -2 are shown in Fig. 2 . The current efficiency rapidly decreased with the increase of temperature for deposition at 10 mA cm -2 current density; while the rate of decrease was very low at 50 mA cm -2 current density. This indicates that oxygen evolution was favored over PbO 2 deposition at higher temperature when deposition was made at low current density. It has been reported [21 , 29 - 31] that for PbO 2 deposition on Ni from 0.5 M Pb(CH 3 SO 3 ) 2 and 0.5 M CH 3 SO 3 H solution, low temperature favored deposition of α-PbO 2 , and high temperature favored deposition of β-PbO 2 . β-PbO 2 has high conductivity due to high electron mobility, and high catalytic activity for oxygen evolution [32 , 33] . So, our results indicate that high temperature favored more β-PbO 2 deposition, and low temperature favored more β-PbO 2 deposition at low current density conditions. It is likely that more favorable oxygen evolution condition decreased current efficiency for PbO 2 deposition with the increase of temperature.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
Effect of temperature on current efficiency for 20 min deposition of PbO2 on Ni from 0.1 M Pb(NO3)2 solution in 0.1 M HNO3.
- 3.2. Cyclic votammetric behaviors
Cyclic voltammetric investigations were conducted on the deposited PbO 2 in 4.7 M H 2 SO 4 solution (lead-acid battery environment) between 1000 to 2200 mV at 30 mV S -1 scan rate. All potentials were measured with respect to SSE. For voltammograms shown in Fig. 3 deposition was made from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution for 20 minutes at 50 mA cm -2 current density. In Fig. 3a , the first cycle for the three voltammograms (1 st , 10 th and 25 th cycles) started anodically at 1000 mV shows a small anodic current rise after approximately 1950 mV, and two cathodic peaks C 1 and C 2 (inset) at1460 mV and 1320 mV respectively. It is known [27] that between two polymorphic forms reduction of orthorhombic α-PbO 2 to PbSO 4 takes place at more positive potential than that for the reduction of tetragonal β-PbO 2 . So, peak C 1 and C 2 are due to reduction of α-PbO 2 and β-PbO 2 respectively. Normally α-PbO 2 deposits from the basic solution and β-PbO 2 deposits from the acidic solution as reported in the literature [19] . In fact, 0.1 M HNO 3 is weak acidic solution. This may be reason for both α-PbO 2 and β-PbO 2 deposition in this acidic environment. The 10 th cycle shows an anodic peak at around 1940 mV which merged with steep current rise after 2080 mV. It has been reported [28 , 34] that the oxidation of PbSO 4 to PbO 2 on Ni surface takes place at around 1800 mV, and oxygen evolution on PbO 2 takes place at further positive potential. Thus, this peak was due to PbO 2 formation and subsequent current rise was due to oxygen evolution. During cathodic scan a new big peak C 3 (α+β-PbO 2 ) appeared at more negative potential (1450 mV) than C 1 with a shoulder of C 2 peak. This peak was due to gradual shifting of C 1 peak potential with the increase of cycle number i.e., α-PbO 2 gradually converted to β-PbO 2 which increases oxygen evolution properties from the start of 2 nd cycle. All peak current densities and currents are several times bigger than that of the first cycle. The anodic scan of the 25 th cycle shows a broad and shallow peak A 2 at around 1450 mV for oxidation of substrate nickel to ultimate NiO(OH) formation as reported elsewhere [28 , 35 , 36] . The cathodic scan shows shifting of C 3 peak potential to more negative value. All current rises are higher than those of 10 th cycle. Increase of oxygen evolution current and other currents suggest formation of porous PbO 2 due to repeated PbO 2 -PbSO 4 -PbO 2 reactions. Noticeable nickel oxidation peak current indicates extension of pores up to Ni surface or falling apart part of PbO 2 film from surface. The influence of cycle number on charge (PbSO 4 → PbO 2 ) and discharge (PbO 2 → PbSO 4 ) densities and charge efficiency are shown in Fig. 3b . The charge and discharge densities was obtained by calculating the area under the anodic and cathodic peaks in Fig. 3a divided by scan rate respectively. However, the charge efficiency was calculated from the ratio of discharge and charge current densities. This figure shows charge and discharge densities increased up to 20 cycles and then decreased. The decrease was due to parting away of PbO 2 from the Ni surface. Initially, charge efficiency over was 140% which steadily decreased with the increase of cycle number. This indicates initially discharge density of PbO 2 film was greater than charge density. This is similar result with literature [21] as they also obtained charge efficiency more than 100% for initial few cycles. This was due to increase of PbSO 4 formation with cycle number, which was difficult for conversion to PbO 2 due to non-conductivity. Densities of α-PbO 2 , β-PbO 2 and PbSO 4 are 9.87 g cm -3 , 9.30 g cm -3 and 6.29 g cm -3 respectively [37] . Conversion of PbO 2 to PbSO 4 increased volume and produced internal stress for expansion. When PbSO 4 was transformed to PbO 2 volume contraction produced porosity resulting more surface area for charge-discharge as well as oxygen evolution reactions.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
a. Cyclic voltammetry on PbO2 in 4.7 M H2SO4 at a scan rate of 30 mV s-1 and b. Effect of cycle number on charge discharge density & charge efficiency. Deposition was made on Ni from 0.1 M Pb(NO3)2 soln. in 0.1 M HNO3 at 50 mA cm-2 current density and 30°C temperature for 20 min.
Cyclic voltammetric results for PbO 2 electrodeposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 are shown in Fig. 4 . The ratio of C 1 and C 2 height is 3.7 as obtained from Fig. 4a (inset of the 1 st cycle) which is 5.9 for electrodeposition from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution. Which suggests that more α-PbO 2 (approximately 85%) formed when deposition was made from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution compared to that (78%) for deposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution under identical deposition conditions. Density of α-PbO 2 is higher than that of β-PbO 2 . This is one of the reasons for obtaining less thick deposit film from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution. However, all anodic and cathodic peak current heights are smaller in this case. Moreover, the 25 th cycle does not show Ni oxidation currents, and the potential for C 3 is more negative than that electrodeposition from electrolyte containing 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 . The charge efficiency attained a constant value (~112%) after 10 th cycle in Fig. 4b . This revealed that electrodeposited of PbO 2 from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution has better charge efficiency cycle number behavior. The oxygen evolution current density i.e., currents after 2000 mV (not shown) was always lower for deposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution. All of these suggest the presence of more β phase in the mixture of (α+β)-PbO 2 , and more compact PbO 2 deposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution compared to that deposited from 0.1 M solution. Although β-PbO 2 favors oxygen evolution reaction, nonetheless due to more compact film formation for deposition from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution less surface was exposed for oxygen evolution and charge-discharge reactions. This compact film was comparatively more adherent as evident from the absence of Ni oxidation peak.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
a. Cyclic voltammetric study on PbO2 in 4.7 M H2SO4 at a scan rate of 30 mV s-1 and b. Effect of cycle number on charge discharge density & charge efficiency. Deposition was made on Ni from 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 soln. in 0.1 M HNO3 at 50 mA cm-2 current density and 30°C temperature for 20 min.
- 3.3. AFM and SEM results
The AFM possesses higher resolution and is more versatile for depth profiling than SEM. AFM images of the PbO 2 film deposited on Ni-surface from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution are shown in Fig. 5 –a , for 30°C and b, for 60°C electrodeposition, while Fig. 5-c , from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution at 30°C. In each case of Image (ii) is three-dimensional representation of the image (i). The grain size and surface roughness were slightly higher (8 μm and 1250 nm) for 60°C deposition than those for 30°C deposition (grain size 5 μm and roughness 902 nm). So, it could be argued that high current efficiency for 30°C and low current efficiency for 60°C electrodeposition conditions from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 are not related to the grain size and morphology of the deposited particles. However, for higher concentration deposition gave more smaller grain in size (avg. 4 μm) as well as lower roughness (620 nm) as compared to above two deposition conditions. Film thicknesses were approximately 79 μm and 74 μm for depositions from 0.5 M and 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solutions respectively. So, numbers of PbO 2 layers were approximately 20 and 14 for deposition from these two solutions. This revealed that electrolytes i. e., H + and HSO 4 ¯ are less capable of penetrating into the film deposited from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution during PbSO 4 -PbO 2 -PbSO 4 conversion process in cyclic voltammetry as we observed earlier in cyclic voltammetry experiment. Fig. 6-a and -b were SEM images of the PbO 2 deposited from 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution at 30°C and 60°C respectively, while 6-c and -d were PbO 2 deposited from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution before and after cyclic voltammetry. The grain produced were bigger in size for higher temperature condition although both were deposited from same 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution. While Relatively irregular pyramid-shape, broken in nature (like broken pebbles) with sharp-edges grain were produced from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution as shown in Fig. 6-c . The results from SEM are in well agreement with AFM study. SEM image ( Fig. 6d ) after 25 cycles of cyclic voltammetry shows that regularshape grains broke completely with the formation of small, irregular shape loosely adhered flappy deposits with many big and deep holes.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
AFM images of PbO2 for 20 min deposition from 0.1 M Pb(NO3)2 at -(a) 30°C, (b) 60°C temperature and from – (c) 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 at 30°C and 50 mA cm-2 current density.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
SEM images of PbO2 deposited from 0.1 M Pb(NO3)2 at -(a) 30°C, (b) 60°C temperature and – (c) & (d) were images of PbO2 before and after 25th cycles deposited from 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 in 0.1 M HNO3 solution at 50 mA cm-2 current density and 30°C.
- 3.4. XRD on PbO2deposits
X-ray diffractograms of the PbO 2 deposited on Ni-surface from electrolytes containing 0.1 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 in 0.1 M HNO 3 are shown in Fig. 7 for - a , 10 mA cm -2 current density and 30°C; b(i) , 50 mA cm -2 current density and 30°C, and b(ii) 50 mA cm -2 current density and 60°C electrodepositions. For ‘ a ’ two intense main peaks at 28.5° and 32.8° are from (111) and (002) planes of α-PbO 2 , for ‘ b(i) ’ four intense peaks at 28.5°, 32.07°, 52.3° and 62.6° are from α(111), β(101), β(220) and β(301) planes, and for b(ii) the two most intense peaks at 59.8° and 62.6° are from α(222) and β(301) planes respectively. Relatively β-PbO 2 peak height increased when current density was increased to 50 mA cm -2 , and temperature was raised from 30°C to 60°C. These indicate that high current density and high temperature favored deposition β-PbO 2 . Fig. 8 shows diffractograms of PbO 2 deposited from 0.5 M Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution at 30°C – a , before and b , after 25 cycles of voltammetry as mentioned in Fig. 4 . The β(101) peak at 32.07° in ‘a’ is the largest one. Even the 2 nd largest broad β(301) peak is bigger than the biggest α(111) peak. These are clear indication that high concentration of Pb(NO 3 ) 2 at 30°C favored deposition of more β-PbO 2 . In ‘b’ the most intense peak is from β(200) plane at 36° and the 2 nd biggest peak is for PbO.PbSO 4 at 30°. Peaks for α-PbO 2 are significantly smaller like the case before cyclic voltammetry. Ni (111) peak at 44.5° is much bigger than any case. This indicates exposure of Ni surface after cyclic voltammmetry.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
X-ray diffractograms of PbO2 deposited for 20 min on Ni from 0.1 M Pb(NO3)2 solution in 0.1 M HNO3 at current densities and temperatures – a, 10 mA cm-2 and 30°C; b(i), 50 mA cm-2 and 30°C, and b(ii) 50 mA cm-2 and 60°C.
PPT Slide
Lager Image
X-ray diffractograms of PbO2 deposited on Ni for 20 min from 0.5 M Pb(NO3)2 solution in 0.1 M HNO3 at 50 mA cm-2 current density & 30°C temperature – (a) before and (b) after 25th cycles as in Fig. 4.
4. Conclusions
Both α- and β-PbO 2 films were electrodeposited on nickel surface from acidic solution of Pb(NO 3 ) 2 . However, high Pb(NO 3 ) 2 concentration, high current density and high temperature resulted increase of β-PbO 2 content in the deposit. Deposition from lower concentration of lead nitrate at higher current density produced mostly porous α-PbO 2 due to innumerous amount of oxygen evolution. Higher temperature and lower lead nitrate solution condition produced larger grain than from deposition at lower temperature and higher solution concentration. More amount of β-PbO 2 in the deposit gives lower charge discharge current densi ty due to their high adherence properties. Both types of PbO 2 were converted into flappy deposit arising some pores during cycling. PbO 2 deposited on nickel surface from the Pb(NO 3 ) 2 solution in 0.1 M HNO 3 in the present experimental conditions could not significantly improve charge-discharge cycles in the lead-acid battery environment.
The authors would like to thank the Atomic Energy Commission, Bangladesh for SEM and XRD instrumental facilities and Central Science Laboratory, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh for their AFM facility.
Bode H. 1977 Lead-Acid Batteries Wiley and Sons New York
Culpin B. , Rand D. 1991 J. Power Sources 36 (4) 415 - 438    DOI : 10.1016/0378-7753(91)80069-A
Hollenkamp A. F. 1996 J. Power Sources 59 (1-2) 87 - 98    DOI : 10.1016/0378-7753(96)02306-3
Jang Y-II. , Dudney N. J. , Tiegs T. N. , Klett J. W. 2006 J. Power Sources 161 (2) 1392 - 1399    DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.04.124
Ai S. , Wang Q. , Li H. , Jin L. 2005 J. Electroanal. Chem. 578 (2) 223 - 229    DOI : 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.01.002
Panizza M. , Cerisola G. 2003 Electrochim. Acta 48 3491 - 3497    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00468-7
Eftkhari A. 2003 Sens. Actuators B 88 (3) 234 - 238    DOI : 10.1016/S0925-4005(02)00321-0
Stucki S. , Theis G. , Kötz R. , Devantay H. , Christen H. J. 1985 J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (2) 367 - 371    DOI : 10.1149/1.2113840
Amadelli R. , Armelao L. , Velichenko A. B. , Nikolenko N. V. , Grienko D. V. , Kovalyov S. V. , Danilov F. I. 1999 Electrochim. Acta 45 (4) 713 - 720    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00250-9
Kinoshita K. 1992 Electrochemical oxygen technology John Wiley & Sons New York
Devilliers D. , Dinh Thi M. T. , Mahé E. , Le Xuan Q. 2003 Electrochim. Acta 48 (28) 4301 - 4309    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.07.005
Johnson D. C. , Feng J. , Houk L. L. 2000 Electrochim. Acta 46 (2) 323 - 330    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00588-0
Tong S. P. , Ma C. A. , Feng H. 2008 Electrochim. Acta 53 (6) 3002 - 3006    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.011
Forti J. C. , De Andrade A. R. 2007 J. Electrochem. Soc. 154 (1) E19 - E24    DOI : 10.1149/1.2393041
Linden D. , Reddy T. B. 2001 Handbook of Batteries 3rd edn. McGraw- Hill New York
Das K. , Mondal A. 1995 J. Power Sources 55 (2) 251 - 254    DOI : 10.1016/0378-7753(95)02191-I
Das K. , Mondal A. 2000 J. Power Sources 89 (1) 112 - 116    DOI : 10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00384-0
Mahalingam T. , Velumani S. , Raja M. , Thanikaikarasan S. , Chu J. P. , Wang S. F. , Kim Y. D. 2007 Mater. Charact. 58 (8) 817 - 822    DOI : 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.11.021
Carr J. P. , Hampson N. A. 1972 Chem. Rev. 72 (6) 679 - 702    DOI : 10.1021/cr60280a003
Czerwiński A. , Źelazowska M. 1997 J. Power sources 64 (1) 29 - 34    DOI : 10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02496-2
Egan D. R. P. , Low C. T. J. , Walsh F. C. 2011 J. Power Sources 196 (13) 5725 - 5730    DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.008
Rüetschi P. 1992 J. Electrochem. Soc. 139 (5) 1347 - 1351    DOI : 10.1149/1.2069410
Feng J. , Johnson D. C. 1990 J. Appl. Electrochem. 20 (1) 116 - 124    DOI : 10.1007/BF01012480
Hampson N. A. , Jones P. C. , Phillips R. F. 1969 Canad. J. Chem. 47 (12) 2171 - 2179    DOI : 10.1139/v69-353
Lee J. , Varela H. , Uhm S. , Tak Y. 2000 Electrochem. Commun. 2 (9) 646 - 652    DOI : 10.1016/S1388-2481(00)00095-3
Shen P. K. , Wei X. L. 2003 Electrochim. Acta 48 (12) 1743 - 1747    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00149-X
Taguchi M. , Sugita H. 2002 J. Power Sources 109 (2) 294 - 300    DOI : 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00056-3
Hurtado M. R. F. , Sumodjo P. T. A. , Benedetti A. V. 2003 Electrochim. Acta 48 (19) 2791 - 2798    DOI : 10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00413-4
Low C. T. J. , Pletcher D. , Walsh F. C. 2009 Electrochem. Commun. 11 (6) 1301 - 1304    DOI : 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.04.032
Sirés I. , Low C. T. J. , Ponce-de-León C. , Walsh F. C. 2010 Electrochim. Acta 55 (6) 2163 - 2172    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.051
Sirés I. , Low C. T. J. , Ponce-de-León C. , Walsh F. C. 2010 Electrochem. Commun. 12 (1) 70 - 74    DOI : 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.10.038
Mindt W. 1969 J. Electrochem. Soc. 116 (8) 1076 - 1078    DOI : 10.1149/1.2412217
Ruetschi P. , Sklarchuk J. , Angstadt R. T. 1963 Electrochim. Acta 8 (5) 333 - 342    DOI : 10.1016/0013-4686(63)80063-8
Rezaei B. , Taki M. 2008 J. Solid State Electrochem. 12 (12) 1663 - 1671    DOI : 10.1007/s10008-008-0547-x
Melendres C. A. , Pankuch M. 1992 J. Electroanal. Chem. 333 (1) 103 - 113    DOI : 10.1016/0022-0728(92)80384-G
Wherens-Dijksma M. , Notten P. H. L. 2006 Electrochim. Acta 51 (18) 3609 - 3621    DOI : 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.10.022
Daniel C. , Besenhard J. O. , Berndt D. 2011 Handbook of Battery Materials 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH Veriag GmbH & Co., VGaA